Independent record labels are being credited with helping
the music industry. For only two weeks of the last three months of 2012, a
non-independent label album topped the Billboard 200. The two records were Unapologetic by Rihanna on Def Jam and Girl on Fire by Alicia Keys on RCA. This
is important because it was what sold the most during the ever-important
holiday season. The albums leading the charge included Babel by Mumford and Sons on Glassnote, Night Train by Jason Aldean on Broken Bow Records, and Red by Taylor Swift on Big Machine Label
Group. Also fitting the trend, the last 5 Grammy Album of the Year winners, Raising Sand by Robert Plant and Alison
Krauss, Fearless by Taylor Swift, The Suburbs by Arcade Fire, 21 by Adele, and Babel, have all been independent label releases.
But how
independent are these releases? How do a small band like Mumford & Sons and
an indie label like Glassnote get so big they are industry darlings? The truth
is they get there with the support network major label releases get. Most
independent labels have a distribution deal with one of three distribution
companies owned by a major label. The most prominent one is RED Distribution,
owned by Sony Music. The company began its start in 1979 distributing hard rock
records as Important Record Distributors. IRD then formed a label called
Relativity that became one of heavy metal’s biggest labels. In 1990, new
management arrived and skewed the label toward hip-hop. Sony also acquired 50%
of the company at this point, laying the groundwork for it’s current position.
The company was renamed Relativity Entertainment Distribution as well. The
company then began to acquire more labels for distribution in the 1990s. Sony
took over full control in 2007. Following the success of RED, Warner Music Group founded its own distribution in 1993, called Alternative Distribution Alliance. Universal Music also has a distribution arm but it is not as large or
successful as the previous two.
Now, some
might say that the majors having a hand in independent music be a bad idea but
so far, it was worked perfectly. The independent labels and the artists they
work with continue to do the work they desire. They in turn take their product
to these distribution arms that do the hard work of promoting and marketing he
album. They also take out a lot of legwork of manufacturing and getting
physical copies to stores. This is why Taylor Swift may be an independent
artist but can have her record be a Target exclusive and have billboard
everywhere. I think it’s a fabulous idea in an era where the bottom line has
become too important a force in how records are made and artists are selected.
It allows indie labels to take a chance because less overhead is needed to
launch their career. Without, I think many of the current trends in music, such
as New Folk, crooner Frank Ocean and the Odd Future collective, and indie bands
such as Arcade Fire and The Black Keys wouldn’t have the outreach to
breakthrough.